[Sasqwatcher]

Here's a link to the London Telegraph report on a man photographing what he believes is the Loch Ness monster. He worked at it 60 hours each week, so this was no random accidental siting, for what that's worth. You can't tell from the photo how big the thing is, or even what it is. I'll let you be the judge.


http://www.telegraph...-on-camera.html

[asylum_souljah]

..."I would say it doesn't prove what Nessie is, but it does prove what Nessie isn't, a sturgeon which is a fish that has been put forward as one of the main explanations as to what Nessie could be but this hasn't got a serrated spine like the sturgeon..."

It also goes on to say he has had the picture analysed by a military friend in the US. Fine.

What I do find interesting about the article is no one mentions it could be a seal. And my first thought the second I looked at the picture was seal.

But this guy is the nessie expert, and I myself believe there is more to the nessie legends than just legend. Unfortunately I dont think the release of this picture alone is enough to make non-believers sit up and take notice, or to end the hunt for whatever there might be out there....but then again, this guy doesnt think its the end of the hunt either.....